Tell a friend

Donate

Email sign-up

defending the First Amendment against the Christian right ...

Jews On First!

... because if Jews don't speak out, they'll think we don't mind

California poll finds strong support for sex education

By Patricia Yollin, San Francisco Chronicle, January 5, 2006

As Californians proliferate with rabbit-like efficiency, the state's residents are surprisingly of one mind about how to deal with overpopulation. Whether they're liberal Democrats or evangelical Christians, they favor sex education and access by the young to birth control.

This is one of the startling discoveries in a wide-ranging survey released Thursday by the Public Policy Institute of California, a nonpartisan San Francisco think tank.

In an endeavor that gives new meaning to the term phone sex, researchers spent two weeks last month calling about 2,500 people around California, asking them about things such as contraceptives, abortion, teen pregnancy, morning-after pills _ and even politics.

Among the findings:

  • A majority of state residents, 78 percent, endorse sex education programs that also teach children how to get and use contraceptives, and think the federal government should pay for the instruction. The institute notes, however, that abstinence-only programs are in vogue with the Bush administration.
  • Fifty-three percent mistakenly see immigration from abroad as the biggest cause of the state's population growth, even though births to residents are mainly responsible for the increase _ something only 12 percent of respondents realize.
  • Sixty percent say U.S. Supreme Court decisions on abortion are very important to them. As for whether Judge Samuel Alito's nomination should be confirmed, 34 percent say yes, 29 percent say no, and 37 percent are undecided.
  • A majority of Californians (58 percent) and likely voters (53 percent) don't approve of how Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger is handling his job, and most are no fans of the Legislature either.
  • The survey's focus on population is not an abstract concern: Demographers predict that the state's population is likely to increase from 37 million now to 46 million by 2025 and the majority of those surveyed (55 percent) say this is a "bad thing."

    And yet: Thirty-six percent of Californians say the ideal number of children to have is three or more.

    In addition, 72 percent believe teen pregnancy rates have increased or remained the same even though they actually have decreased across the state.

    Are people really this confused and contradictory?

    "There's a lot of work to be done," said survey director Mark Baldassare. "People don't have a basic understanding about the dynamics driving growth these days."

    He was especially taken aback by the misplaced focus on immigration as a culprit in the swelling of the state.

    "I was most surprised by the fact that most Californians don't fully appreciate the role of births in population growth," Baldassare said. "One other thing that struck me is the broad consensus for programs that promote birth control and sex education _ support across racial and ethnic and regional and political categories to make birth control accessible and available."

    The single greatest contributor to the state's population increase is births to residents _ almost half in recent years have been to immigrant women. There have been about 500,000 births annually in California in the 2000s, and the rate is projected to stay at that level, or rise above it, for the next decade.

    The survey, which has a 2 percent sampling error and was conducted in English, Spanish, Chinese, Korean and Vietnamese, contained other unexpected tidbits as well.

    For example, 71 percent of respondents do not want a reversal of Roe vs. Wade, the 1973 U.S. Supreme Court decision legalizing abortion. Even 52 percent of respondents who described themselves as evangelical Christians want it to stick around. "Most people do not want to change the basic laws and structures of the land," Baldassare said.



    Fair Use Statement: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.